Isolating Moral Harm
“What is evil to thee does not subsist in the ruling principle of another.” Marcus Aurelius wrote that line to himself as a hard constraint: nothing another person thinks or intends can directly corrupt your faculty of judgment. Stoicism locates moral injury in assent, not in events. That is not denial of pain or consequence; it’s a design decision about agency. Keep the control of meaning and response inside your own system.
This matters most when the stakes are real—combat orders, an engine room fire, a production outage, a boardroom reversal. Under pressure, the boundary between what happens to us and what we become because of it can blur. Aurelius’s reminder restores separation: others act; you decide what those actions become in you.
The Ruling Principle as Control Plane
The Stoics called the ruling principle the hegemonikon—the faculty that interprets, decides, and commits. In systems terms, it is the control plane. External behavior, weather, markets, politics, even malice—these are the data plane. Data can be hostile or benign, but it does not change your control plane unless you grant write access.
Threats to that sovereignty are familiar:
-
Provocation reframed as obligation to retaliate.
-
Fear disguised as urgency.
-
Flattery smuggled in as alignment.
-
Algorithmic feeds calibrated to bypass reflection and trigger assent.
Emotional sovereignty is not numbness. It is disciplined write protection on the core. You still feel. You just choose what gets committed.
Sovereignty Is Not Passivity
Stoicism is often misread as permission for injustice. The opposite. If injury is internal assent, then you are free to act externally with clarity: investigate, hold standards, enforce consequences, repair damage. Lead without importing someone else’s intent into your character.
Two planes:
-
Inner: judgment, values, assent. Non-negotiable.
-
Outer: action, policy, incentives, accountability. Highly negotiable.
When the inner plane holds, the outer plane can be firm without becoming vindictive. Justice without spite is a competitive advantage in any enduring system.
Practices That Protect Your Ruling Principle
Aurelius wrote reminders because even emperors drift. So do captains, founders, and engineers. A few disciplines keep the interface hard:
-
Name the impression before you assent. “I have the impression I’ve been disrespected.” Labeling slows the hand on the throttle.
-
Separate fact from story. Fact: “The release failed and rolled back.” Story: “They sabotaged me.” Decide on facts; investigate stories.
-
Pre-commit to standards. Rules of engagement, escalation thresholds, and standing orders make it easier to act under pressure without ceding control to adrenaline.
-
Use time as a circuit breaker. Very little actually requires instant response. A five-minute walk can save a five-year relationship.
-
Write the decision. A short log—what you saw, what you believed, why you chose—improves learning and limits rationalization.
-
Design guardrails. Two-person checks, rate limits on high-risk changes, and clear authorities reduce the chance that someone else’s panic becomes your plan.
-
Practice subtraction. Remove inputs that routinely hijack attention. Less outrage in, more judgment available.
Where It Matters: Three Brief Scenes
-
Wheelhouse at night. A vessel crosses too close and the radio crackles with blame. The urge is to respond in kind. The ruling principle asks only: what reduces collision risk now? Change course, confirm CPA, log the incident. File the report later without anger, but with precision.
-
Software outage. An engineer pushes an unreviewed fix and the system collapses at peak. Anger is available. So is clarity: stabilize, communicate, roll back, analyze the guardrail failure. Accountability can follow soberly: improve review discipline; retrain; adjust access. Prevent recurrence without tearing the fabric of the team.
-
Negotiation under pressure. A counterparty manufactures urgency: “Sign today or we walk.” That is data, not destiny. You can decline the frame: “We won’t trade diligence for speed. If the window closes, we accept that.” Many poor deals are signed by borrowed urgency.
In each case, external force is real. Moral harm arrives only if you let it set your terms.
Moral Harm vs. Real Damage
Stoicism does not erase wounds. Bodies break. Reputations suffer. Resources vanish. The claim is narrower: moral failure—becoming unjust, cowardly, or dishonest—requires our assent. That distinction matters because it preserves the capacity to address real damage without compounding it with internal collapse.
Leaders hold two truths at once:
-
Compassion for people navigating real harm.
-
Resolve to keep the inner standard intact, especially when it would be easier to excuse its erosion.
Humans and AI: Keep Judgment Primary
Intelligent systems amplify patterns, including our worst ones. They can accelerate reaction and multiply error. They also can support better decisions—if subordinated to human purpose.
Practical boundaries:
-
Intent first. Declare your objective and constraints before you query a model. Don’t let output redefine goals.
-
Human-in-the-loop on value-laden calls. Use AI for options and analysis, not for commitments that touch ethics, safety, or people.
-
Audit trails. Preserve prompts, rationale, and decisions. Transparency disciplines assent.
-
Rate limits on automation. Slow down systems that can do large-scale harm quickly. Align speed with confidence, not convenience.
AI should sharpen thinking, reduce noise, and expose options. It should never be permitted to write to the ruling principle.
The Long Work
Aurelius’s line is not a posture; it is maintenance. You will forget, assent too quickly, and inherit someone else’s anger, fear, or vanity. Then you rebuild. The work is cumulative: small refusals to be provoked; consistent returns to standards; systems designed to protect judgment when you are tired.
What others do is outside your control. What you become because of it is not. That is the ground on which durable leadership stands.
If this perspective aligns with your own practice, subscribe to The Rissler Perspective to follow new essays and field notes as they’re published.
